some sources/views

https://www.amazon.com/Jung-Eastern-Thought-Harold-Coward/dp/8170302587

doctoral thesis: Plato, archetypes, Neumann, divine feminine, mental birth control
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=jung+individuation+yin+yang&as_epq=unconscious+contents+become+conscious&as_oq=dialectic+dialectical&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=&as_occt=any&safe=images&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=&gws_rd=ssl

"Memories, Dreams, Reflections" by Carl Jung
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56q3SLpRCv0

re father dream, Memories, Dreams...p. 219 (not convinced re this POV yet)
http://www.sawka.com/spiritwatch/some_relations_between_clinical_.htm

https://www.google.com/search?as_q=shadow+jung+anima+Ren%C3%A9+Girard+shakti&as_epq=yin+and+yang&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=&as_occt=any&safe=images&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=&gws_rd=ssl

cited by above search
http://www.pelicanweb.org/solisustv05n03page1.html

https://www.google.com/search?as_q=shadow+jung+anima+Ren%C3%A9+Girard+shakti&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=&as_occt=any&safe=images&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=&gws_rd=ssl

cited by above search http://www.timwillison.com/dissertation.html

http://timysteries.org/category/memories-dreams-reflections/

http://www.eng.vedanta.ru/library/prabuddha_bharata/the_appeal_of_the_upanishads_today.php

http://www.hinduism.co.za/maya-sha.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timaeus_(dialogue)

The Relation of Jung's Psychology
to Meister Eckhart and Jakob Boehme
http://www.members.shaw.ca/cgjung/Jung_Eckhart.html

I don't endorse any belief in a demiurge, but the need to come up with such an explanation may shed light on something. An alternative might be along the lines of Schopenhauer's "will to power," or Cayce's voice's explanation (dinosaurs, etc), or Zukav's concept of the single consciousness of an entire species (though not relevant he said to humans).
http://montalk.net/gnosis/171/corruption-of-the-demiurge

http://integral-review.org/documents/Julich,%20Vol.%209,%20No.%203,%20CIIS%20Special%20Issue.pdf

Pride's precipitated many a fall. Fromm talked about the 19th cent male bourgeois version, and now of course we have meritocracy.  Having grown up in a house full of books, there's a change I never anticipated that's come over me. And that is the view that a "genius" is not responsible for her/his genius. Such a person is only in a particular place at a particular time under particular conditions that enable opening up the creativity-tap wide when it comes to a particular problem, or set of problems. I'm not talking about aptitude. I'm talking about when things get carried to the level of venerating. Respect of "genius" can't move very fast beyond convention and/or certain fields of interest in whatever moment or epoch. Case in point...people are slow to see the paradigm Rene Girard bumped into (I mean the revolutionary aspect of it) simply because it's germane to the un-trendy field of anthropology (Girard was a lit prof).

I was transfixed by Ramana Maharshi's life for a long time. And I'd STILL like to see what Einstein saw in those thought experiments of his. But I disagree with their opinions on all things being preordained. There is a great deal to consider in terms of writings on Nature's intent to be creative...even to maintain production of novelty. ONE consciousness collapsing all waves (if you know what I mean) I would disagree with...say if the corollary was that outcomes in the macro world emerge as it is alleged outcomes emerge at the quantum level.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqLDWyk1uLQ